首页> 外文OA文献 >Tissue oximetry: a comparison of mean values of regional tissue saturation, reproducibility and dynamic range of four NIRS-instruments on the human forearm
【2h】

Tissue oximetry: a comparison of mean values of regional tissue saturation, reproducibility and dynamic range of four NIRS-instruments on the human forearm

机译:组织血氧饱和度:比较人体前臂上四个NIRS仪器的区域组织饱和度,重现性和动态范围的平均值

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We compared absolute values of regional tissue hemoglobin saturation (StO2), reproducibility, and dynamic range of four different instruments on the forearm of adults. The sensors were repositioned 10 times on each subject. Dynamic range was estimated by exercise with subsequent arterial occlusion. Mean StO2 was 70.1% ± 6.7 with INVOS 5100, 69.4% ± 5.0 with NIRO 200 NX, 63.4% ± 4.5 with NIRO 300, and 60.8% ± 3.6 with OxyPrem. The corresponding reproducibility Sw was 5.4% (CI 4.4–6.9), 4.4% (CI 3.5–5.2), 4.1% (CI 3.3–4.9), and 2.7% (CI 2.2–3.2), respectively. The dynamic ranges ΔStO2 were 45.0%, 46.8%, 44.8%, and 27.8%, respectively. In conclusion, the three commercial NIRS instruments showed different absolute values, whereas reproducibility and dynamic range were quite similar.
机译:我们比较了成人前臂上四种不同仪器的区域组织血红蛋白饱和度(StO2),可重复性和动态范围的绝对值。在每个对象上将传感器重新定位10次。通过运动和随后的动脉闭塞估计动态范围。使用INVOS 5100时,平均StO2为70.1%±6.7,使用NIRO 200 NX时为69.4%±5.0,对于NIRO 300为63.4%±4.5,对于OxyPrem为60.8%±3.6。相应的重现性Sw分别为5.4%(CI 4.4-6.9),4.4%(CI 3.5-5.2),4.1%(CI 3.3-4.9)和2.7%(CI 2.2-3.2)。动态范围ΔStO2分别为45.0%,46.8%,44.8%和27.8%。总之,三种商用NIRS仪器显示出不同的绝对值,而重现性和动态范围却非常相似。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号